Comments on: Two Demands NOT Met! Reprisals still in effect! http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/ Casting the mask of tyranny aside Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:08:41 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: albert W http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/#comment-142 albert W Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:14:57 +0000 http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/#comment-142 what about a few staff members? they should not be on administrative leaves. They should go back to work immediately. Why are they not at work? Without them, JK would have been our President. Please fight to have no reprisal for these employees. they need our support this time. Help fighting to remove the reprisal. That may be the last laugh for IKJ and Paul Kelly. what about a few staff members? they should not be on administrative leaves. They should go back to work immediately. Why are they not at work? Without them, JK would have been our President. Please fight to have no reprisal for these employees. they need our support this time. Help fighting to remove the reprisal. That may be the last laugh for IKJ and Paul Kelly.

]]> By: NeilMcD http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/#comment-141 NeilMcD Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:36:50 +0000 http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/#comment-141 Hey, Rob; I would point out that the GUFSSA.com site says the two demands are: JKF go bye-bye and the presidential search reopened. Those have been met. The No Reprisals demand was dropped (after summer?) . That said, I agree with you above: Idiots who damaged university property should be prosecuted. People who were simply protesting should face either no reprisals or get simple community service. Hey, Rob;

I would point out that the GUFSSA.com site says the two demands are: JKF go bye-bye and the presidential search reopened. Those have been met. The No Reprisals demand was dropped (after summer?) .

That said, I agree with you above: Idiots who damaged university property should be prosecuted. People who were simply protesting should face either no reprisals or get simple community service.

]]> By: privateinvestigator http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/#comment-138 privateinvestigator Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:19:12 +0000 http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/#comment-138 Are we distinguishing between those protestors who closed the gates from those who destroyed the SAC sign and College Hall window? The latter certainly deserve punishment; the former no. Are we distinguishing between those protestors who closed the gates from those who destroyed the SAC sign and College Hall window? The latter certainly deserve punishment; the former no.

]]> By: A Voice http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/#comment-137 A Voice Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:07:21 +0000 http://privateinvestigator.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/two-demands-not-met-reprisals-still-in-effect/#comment-137 Nope. The fight is over. You are not going to get a free pass just because you decided to break the law. This will create a poor example for future peers if the inexcusable behaviors were forgiven. Nope. The fight is over.

You are not going to get a free pass just because you decided to break the law. This will create a poor example for future peers if the inexcusable behaviors were forgiven.

]]>